Filing Signals

Source: SEC EDGAR Compiled 2026-11-14 10:32 UTC 23 automated checks passing

← All events

Brightline Interactive, Inc./NV

CIK 1854445 BTLN·Services · All EDGAR filings ↗

Progression

  1. Auditor change 8-K
  2. Finance chief departure 8-K +132d
  3. Going concern 10-K +130d
Refine
Form
An amendment is grouped with the report it amends; every 12b-25 notice is one group

Material weakness high Filing comparison

Brightline Interactive, Inc./NV reported a material weakness in internal control

Internal control reported effective → Material weakness in internal control

The Company’s finance department had insufficient technical resources supporting the assessment of the complex technical accounting and review procedures were not performed at a level of precision to prevent or detect a material misstatement on a timely basis in the normal course of the review. Based on this assessment, management believes that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of June 30, 2026. Remediation Measures We have identified and begun to implement steps, as further…
Evidence
Current state
material_weakness
Current state label
Material weakness in internal control
Direction
newly reported
Prior filed
2025-09-29
Prior form
10-K
Prior state
effective
Prior state label
Internal control reported effective
Remediation stated
No
Severity
high
Source
Item 9A internal control conclusion, compared with the prior filing
Why
The company's conclusion on internal control over financial reporting changed: a material weakness was newly reported, or a previously reported one no longer appears.
Going concern Filing comparison

Brightline Interactive, Inc./NV disclosed substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern

No substantial-doubt conclusion identified → Substantial doubt about ability to continue as a going concern

Furthermore, the circumstances around the goodwill impairment challenge the Company. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents as of the date of this filing may not be sufficient to fund operations and other commitments for at least the next twelve months from the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the Company has concluded that substantial doubt exists about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least 12 months from the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements. In order to restore the going concern the…
Evidence
Blank check
No
Comparable
Yes
Current state
substantial_doubt
Current state label
Substantial doubt about ability to continue as a going concern
Direction
escalated
Located in
going-concern note
Prior filed
2025-09-29
Prior form
10-K
Prior state
none
Prior state label
No substantial-doubt conclusion identified
Source
ASC 205-40 going-concern note comparison
Why
Disclosure about the company's ability to continue as a going concern changed compared with its previous report.
Finance chief departure Filing comparison

Glimpse Group, Inc.'s Chief Financial Officer departed and a successor was named

Evidence
Interim only
No
Item code
5.02
Item title
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers
Role
Chief Financial Officer
Severity
normal
Source
SEC 8-K item code
Successor named
Yes
Why
The company's chief financial or accounting officer departed, disclosed under 8-K Item 5.02.
Formerly
Glimpse Group, Inc.
Auditor change SEC item code

Glimpse Group, Inc. dismissed Turner, Stone & Company, L.L.P and engaged GreenGrowth CPAs

The company dismissed the auditor. Turner, Stone & Company, L.L.P → GreenGrowth CPAs No disagreements disclosed.

Evidence
Direction
dismissed
Direction label
The company dismissed the auditor
Disagreements disclosed
No
Item code
4.01
Item title
Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant
Predecessor auditor
Turner, Stone & Company, L.L.P
Predecessor tier
other
Severity
normal
Source
SEC 8-K item code
Successor auditor
GreenGrowth CPAs
Successor tier
other
Why
The company's independent registered accounting firm changed.
Formerly
Glimpse Group, Inc.