Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. CETY118 days end to end
- Late filing NT 10-K
- Restatement 8-K +37d
- Going concern 10-K +29d
- Auditor change 8-K +41d
- Accounting standard newly cited 10-Q +11d
Companies with signals from more than one filing occasion. Each timeline shows their order and elapsed time, using filing dates.
These records show what was disclosed and when. One event does not imply that another will follow.
What is not a sequence. A Form 12b-25 followed by the report it deferred is Rule 12b-25 working, not a company deteriorating: the rule grants five calendar days for a 10-Q and fifteen for a 10-K, and the disclosure the tracker then reports comes from that very report. Those pairs are excluded, as are two signals read out of a single filing. One filing is one occasion.
As of 2026-11-12, all filing-history files listed by SEC EDGAR were loaded for 2609 of 2609 companies recorded here — 19,206 historical events from 2004-08-23 through 2026-11-12.
The rule, exactly. A company counts once, not once per event. For each pair, the denominator includes companies whose earliest observed first event was at least 540 days before the date above. A follow-on counts if the second event appears strictly after that first event and within 540 days of it. Same-day pairs are excluded. Companies still within the window are excluded even if a second event has already appeared.
Records include the recent submissions index and every older file it lists. The observation period starts on 2004-08-23, when the current 8-K item numbering took effect; earlier late notices are excluded because their follow-on events were not reported under the same item codes. EDGAR coverage and item coding vary across issuers, so the earliest observed event may not be the first in a company’s life. The window measures elapsed calendar time; a company that stops SEC reporting can leave later events unobserved.
Descriptive historical association among the companies recorded here, over the filing history covered so far. Not a prediction, and not evidence that one event causes another.
| Sequence | Companies with a full 540-day window | Excluded: window still open | Followed by the second | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| An auditor change was followed by a non-reliance filing | 1386 | 187 | 153 | 11% |
| A late filing was followed by a non-reliance filing | 1422 | 211 | 224 | 16% |
| A late filing was followed by an auditor change | 1422 | 211 | 488 | 34% |
| A non-reliance filing was followed by an auditor change | 670 | 73 | 270 | 40% |
Read this narrowly. These are conditional rates inside a population this tracker already flagged, not population base rates. There is no matched control group, so they cannot tell you that one event makes another more likely — only how often, among these companies, one followed the other. Companies were selected because this tracker flagged them, and historical coverage varies. Read each rate alongside its company count and the exclusions above.
120 of 620 companies are shown, ordered by how many signals each reached. Every company’s full sequence is on its own page.
No sequences match that filter.